Friday, November 21, 1997, marked the end of
the world as we knew it, judging by the coverage that appeared in
The Toronto Sun. After three years of
unfulfilled dreams of building a championship basketball team,
Isiah Lord Thomas III, the unhappy general manager and part-owner
of the Raptors, was packing up and leaving his "baby" for a
broadcasting job at NBC. For more than an hour, wiping away tears
and exuding sincerity, he spoke of wanting to thank "the people
of Toronto, who I'll miss dearly, and the members of the media
for the respect you've given me." Sob, sniffle. "We've built a
foundation. I only wish I could have been around to finish the
house, move in the furniture and invite you all to dinner."
Later, the lights were dim and the waiters at
Ruth's Chris Steak House bustled to restore order after the press
conference. Gone were the mikes and cables. Gone were the trays
of lavish barbecued kebabs, garlic bread and shrimp hors
d'oeuvres. And gone was the pack of reporters. Well, all except
Thomas's coterie of media friends gathered at the bar.
The Toronto Sun's Heather Bird, Bill Harris
and Craig Daniels plus a handful of broadcast journalists waited
for their special farewell. Upon first sight of the sad-eyed
Bird, Thomas picked her up, hugged her and uttered, "Oh, Birdie,"
before they both wept.
Bird's Saturday column was a
lament about "losing Isiah": "Yesterday...when he was alone save
for a few folks, he held his hand over his eyes and wept during
an emotional farewell....But through his tears, he vowed to
return, perhaps with another team, to fight again some day."
Daniels, the Sun's basketball columnist and
reporter, had been in mourning since the previous day, when his
news story on Thomas's departure ran under the headline "Team in
Turmoil," set in type big enough to announce the outbreak of a
minor war. In his column two pages along, he mused sardonically,
"I guess Thomas must be a bad person even though...I never saw
Thomas treat people, including the media, with anything but
respect....And I guess nobody in Toronto will miss Isiah Thomas."
Harris's piece in the Saturday sports section was a little more
straight-ahead, but still sympathetic. After quoting Thomas
saying, "[My] pockets couldn't support my emotions any more," he
concluded with another Thomas quote: "It's a billionaire's
business. It's a corporate business. I'm not old enough to act
like a corporation."
The coverage was a perfect
illustration of the cozy three-year relationship the charismatic
Thomas had with most of the Toronto sports press-what James
Deacon, sports editor of Maclean's magazine,
characterizes accurately if unimaginatively as "an extended
honeymoon." Thomas cast a spell over the city and used his press
favourites to get out well-timed leaks. He charmed and he
seduced. Toronto Star sports writer Mary
Ormsby, who has followed pro sports for 17 years, says simply:
"Everyone just fell in love with him. He was so new, he was so
different, he was this great star."
THE
HONEYMOON BEGAN THE MORNING OF May 24, 1994. The lights were
dimmed in Wayne Gretzky's restaurant as Thomas's silhouette
appeared behind a screen showing a Raptor logo. When Thomas burst
through wearing a Raptors leather jacket and holding a
basketball, he also literally burst onto the Toronto sports
scene. It was the first time Toronto's all-white, middle-class
sports press had caught a glimpse of the then 33-year-old Thomas:
a beautiful, articulate, wealthy black American regarded as one
of the 50 greatest players in the history of NBA.
John
Bitove Jr., then Raptors president, had succeeded in his bid for
an NBA team in November 1993. Having Thomas as vice-president of
basketball operations was a dream come true. Bitove had first
encountered Thomas in 1980, when Bitove was attending Indiana
University and Thomas was the star on the Hoosiers NCAA
championship team. Later, while Bitove studied law at the
University of Windsor, Thomas was across the river, growing into
the Detroit Pistons's prized point guard, having joined the team
after leaving Indiana in '81. Thomas stayed for 13 seasons; as
team captain, he led the Pistons to NBA championships in 1989 and
1990, earning MVP honours for the 1990 playoffs. He was the
team's all-time leader in points, assists and steals.
For Toronto, Thomas was the complete package. Not even Madison
Avenue could have dreamed him up. He came with diplomatic answers
to questions and endless analogies-raising babies, building a
house, baking a cake-for the process of creating a winning team.
He spoke like a preacher-gazing up to the sky, using his hands to
emphasize his message-and constantly referred to himself in the
third person. Thomas's basketball bona fides brought instant
credibility to the fledgling basketball organization. His
GQ-ish style-from his 1,000-watt smile to his
three-piece designer suits-brought an image.
The press
approached him with deference, even awe. True, there were a few
dissenters. Star basketball columnist Chris
Young criticized Bitove for suggesting Thomas was the most
capable in the league for the position, rather than admitting he
was a long-time Thomas admirer. He wrote: "A cynic would call it
an old-boys' network, or perhaps the move by an owner with more
fan(fare) than sense in him." Neil Campbell, then a
Globe sports reporter, criticized the Raptors
for being more concerned with style than substance: "Hiring
Thomas to run the basketball show...is the sort of stunt one
might expect from a Harold Ballard or a George Steinbrenner." But
for the most part, the media were wowed. Dave Perkins, at the
time the Star's sports editor, compared
Thomas-who had been GM for less than a day at that point-to Pat
Gillick, the Toronto Blue Jays' long-time general manager who
over 18 years had built a two-time consecutive World Series
championship team. Craig Daniels described Thomas as "one of the
most charismatic names in the game" and quoted Bitove to counter
the skepticism about Thomas's management credentials: "He has
been more than a player on any team he has played on." It wasn't
long before many in Toronto's sports circle considered Daniels
"the lint in Thomas's pockets."
Clearly, Thomas
deserved some praise for his early moves as GM. For instance, in
the inaugural draft, he acquired Damon Stoudamire, who would
become the 1995/96 NBA Rookie of the Year. But his subsequent
drafts and trades were less successful. Sharone Wright, for
example, was an expensive bust, and forward Marcus Camby, picked
second in the 1996-97 NBA draft, proved to be oft-injured.
Then came the epitome of bad moves: the firing of
Brendan Malone. Malone had been hired as coach in June 1995. The
press credited the 27-year coaching veteran with guiding the
Raptors to an impressive debut record of 21 wins-one of the best
in NBA history for an expansion team. There was excitement in the
stands; record numbers of fans were attending games. But by
mid-season, Thomas had begun a campaign through the media to get
rid of Malone. Neil Campbell, now the Globe's
sports editor, has this theory: "Brendan Malone's popularity
spooked him. Isiah likes to be the centre of attention."
First, in February of last year, on the popular
all-sports radio station The Fan 590, Thomas publicly chastised
Malone. He said Malone was giving too much floor time to proven
players and not enough time to the team's rookies. On March 26,
according to a story that appeared in the
Globe several weeks later, Thomas coached John
Lashway, the Raptors executive director of communications, to
question him during a media scrum following a Raptor game on the
importance of the team getting a high draft choice. (Lashway
denied the charge.) Under Malone, the theory went, the team was
doing so well that its chances of a high draft pick for the
following season were threatened.
On April 1, Daniels
suggested in his column that Malone had challenged the GM by
taking his direction to play more rookies so literally in a game
against Orlando that the Raptors had lost by 40 points. Daniels
also wrote that if the team wanted a good chance for selecting
young star players in the draft, "Malone must be removed now."
Two days later, Daniels predicted: "Reading between the lines,
short of God dropping everything else, Malone won't be back as
head coach next season. The coach has publicly defied the GM and
he has lost the respect of the players in the process." Then, on
April 19, following the Raptors's last game of the season, Malone
was terminated. At the subsequent press conference Thomas
announced that Malone had "stepped down" as coach, citing
"philosophical differences."
In a city whose
competitive sports press is often hypercritical of the way the
Blue Jays and the Maple Leafs are managed, Thomas hardly received
any criticism for firing a winning coach. Instead, the majority
of the local writers supported him, aside from Young, the
Globe sportswriters and Steve Simmons, sports
columnist for the Sun-all of whom were the
most critical of Thomas from beginning to end. In the
Sun, Bill Lankhof suggested "the problem with
Malone is that he was stubborn. He kept cutting the strings
whenever his boss, GM Isiah Thomas, tried to orchestrate the
puppet show." Both Ormsby and Daniels referred to the canning of
Malone as a "mercy killing." Ormsby went on to say that "Malone
picked a fight with an unbeatable foe," and wrote of Malone
"breaking the first commandment of coaching: Thou shalt not diss
thy GM."
In retrospect, Ormsby sees things differently:
"Brendan Malone came out looking like the bad guy and Isiah
wiggled off the hook big time. Had that happened five years
later, I don't think Isiah would have gotten off as lightly as he
did."
However, in April, Thomas wiggled off the hook
again. That was when Money Players, the
controversial book detailing off-court crises and scandals within
the NBA, was released. Written by three respected
journalists-award-winning ABC News
correspondent Armen Keteyian and Sports
Illustrated's investigative reporter Martin Dardis,
along with Harvey Araton, sports columnist for The New
York Times-Money Players alleged in one chapter that as
a player Thomas had been involved in an elaborate game-fixing
scheme with the mob-once, in 1989, faking a concussion to throw a
game.
But on April 8, at a press conference that lasted
only 15 minutes, Thomas dismissed the book's charges as "lies,
rumours and innuendos." When one reporter asked if there was ever
a reason for him to throw a game, Thomas angrily responded, "My
record speaks for itself and it's insulting that I even have to
answer that question. Can you imagine me doing that?" Apparently,
no one could, particularly Daniels and Ormsby. Daniels wrote that
"any open-minded person" was inclined to believe Thomas and
questioned the authors' use of unnamed sources. Ormsby claimed to
have "blown apart" the book's charge of Thomas feigning a head
injury by acquiring Thomas's medical records, which, she said,
proved he had a cerebral concussion. It's noteworthy, however,
that to date Thomas has not sued the book's authors for
libel.
THROUGHOUT HIS DAYS IN THE NBA,
Thomas was known for his toughness and intimidation on court and
off. Known as the "Little Big Man," Thomas was the baddest of the
Bad Boys. But he was also skilled at turning potential critics
into allies. Terry Foster, a sports reporter for The
Detroit News who covered Thomas in his playing days,
recalls how in the spring of 1990 he wrote several articles
criticizing Thomas's performance. Thomas hated the coverage and
told Foster so. But later that season, during an off day in the
Pistons's playoff schedule in Chicago against the Bulls, Thomas
invited Foster to his hotel room at the Ritz-Carleton. The
meeting was a turning point in their relationship. The two men
discussed their experiences growing up as black Americans; Thomas
even admitted to fearing the media. Foster remembers Thomas
saying they have the power to shape him in any image they decide.
Michael Grange, sports reporter for the
Globe, recalls Thomas using a similar approach
with him. The day after the story of Thomas's departure broke,
Grange telephoned Thomas. Thomas said he wanted to go off the
record and Grange agreed, expecting some sort of important
revelation. Thomas said he needed to ask Grange something
important. The big question: "What do you think of me?"
"I felt like I was talking to a girlfriend or something," Grange
recalls. "It's tough when you get close to someone like that and
you want to be liked by them," he says. "[But]
if that person, in turn, wants you to actively like them, you
really have to put your guard up." Later that week, Grange put
his thoughts on Thomas's breach of their business relationship
into print: "Rather than keeping relationships at a professional
distance, he tries to go beyond them for his advantage."
Not everyone in Toronto remained immune to the Thomas
charm. Take the case of the buyout plan. In December 1996, Thomas
announced he wanted to gain majority ownership of the Toronto
Raptors, buying out broadcast mogul Allan Slaight, who had
acquired 81 percent of the team from Bitove in November. The
success of the scheme turned on the Maple Leafs hockey team
becoming the Raptors's roommates at the $207-million Air Canada
Centre, then under construction.
By late April 1997,
shortly after the release of Money Players,
Thomas signed a letter of intent to purchase the Raptors.
Everyone assumed that Thomas had the money to gain control. The
press immediately awarded Thomas the status of majority
owner-in-waiting. Star columnist Rosie DiManno
called Thomas the "great black hope," contrasting him with
Slaight as the unhip old white businessman who "wouldn't
recognize a basketball if it hit him in the head." Star
sports columnist Dave Perkins described Thomas as the
"owner of promise" and the "Raptors' guiding light."
The idea of Thomas becoming the first black majority owner of a
sports franchise was a regular theme in the stories that appeared
at this time. In July, Grange wrote: "Thomas's pending purchase
of the Toronto Raptors gives wonderful symmetry to the 50th
anniversary of baseball player Jackie Robinson's breaking of the
colour barrier."
Two days prior to the signing of the
letter of intent to purchase, rumours that Thomas would leave
town if he failed to acquire majority ownership had conveniently
begun to surface. On April 19, Daniels wrote: "There are strong
indications Raptors vice-president Isiah Thomas is readying to
give up his job and leave the franchise. It turns out that
Thomas's deal to buy the team from Allan Slaight is stuck." (The
Globe's Neil Campbell says Thomas is skilled
at leaking information. "Reporters in a very competitive market
like Toronto are looking to get any edge they can," he adds. If
Isiah wanted to plant a story with a reporter, he'd certainly
"find an audience.")
It took a political columnist to
point out the obvious. In an August column, the
Sun's Peter Worthington described Thomas's
overall plan as "perilously close to a legal form of
blackmail....If he'd been a white guy, I suspect there'd be a
hullabaloo about the ethics. But the media are dazzled by the
possibility of Thomas making history as the first black owner-an
entrepreneurial Jackie Robinson, to stretch a metaphor."
From April to November, Thomas's media friends
attributed Thomas's inability to close the deal to Slaight's
raising the price. The real problem was that Thomas's bid failed
to provide a hint of solid financing. When the deal with the
Leafs fell through, Thomas and his investors assumed Slaight's
selling price would drop.
Instead, on August 2, Thomas
and Slaight held a joint press conference at which they announced
Thomas's failure to acquire majority ownership of the Raptors
(Slaight would eventually sell in February 1998 to the Toronto
Maple Leafs for an estimated sum of $500 million). At the time,
Thomas vowed, "I'm firmly committed to staying here, I'm firmly
committed to taking this team to a championship."
Three
months later, that firm commitment had vanished. On November 18,
Doug Smith's story about Thomas leaving the Raptors for NBC
appeared on the front page of the Star.
Slaight's camp is believed to have leaked the story to Smith to
force Thomas's hand, although Smith won't confirm this. After
three years of breaking Raptor stories for the
Sun, Daniels had missed out on the scoop of
scoops. "This was A-1 front page, end of the world stuff...and
the Sun didn't have a word," says one source.
"When the big story comes, the guy burned him. It's the perfect
cautionary tale." If Daniels feels singed, he's not letting on.
About his relationship with Thomas, he says rather opaquely: "The
pleasantness of the relationship depends on what's happened, the
stories, the events, the way that person feels he's been treated
by you."
And how did Thomas treat Daniels? "He's good
at making other people feel good," Daniels responds.
Is
it possible to be a fan of Isiah Thomas and still cover the man
objectively? "You can't let it not affect you," he says. "As you
get to like people, it changes the way you cover them. And to say
that we're immune from that is to suggest that journalists aren't
human beings."
Try explaining that to the readers who
expect objectivity from journalists, regardless of their beat.
While being on a first-name basis with subjects may be accepted
in sports writing, being a cheerleader is not. Or so I
thought.