On February 23, the bodies of correspondent
Atwar Bahjat, cameraman Khaled Mahmoud al-Falahi and engineer
Adnan Khairallah were found near Samarra, Iraq. Bahjat was a
correspondent for Al-Arabiya, while
al-Falahi and Khairallah were employees of Wasan Productions on
assignment for Al-Arabiya. The Wasan crew
was covering the bombing of a Shiite shrine near Samarra, Iraq,
when armed men attacked them and demanded to know the whereabouts
of Bahjat. Their last broadcast was at 6 P.M. the day before
their bodies were found.
On February 2, Wu
Xianghu, deputy editor of Taizhou Wanbao,
died of liver and kidney failure after months of hospitalization.
He was attacked by traffic police in the eastern coastal city of
Taizhou, Zhejiang province, China, in October 2005, after writing
an embarrassing exposé of high fee collections for electric
bicycle licenses.
>
On January 25,
Baghdad TV correspondent Mahmoud Za'al was shot and killed in a
U.S. air strike while covering an insurgent attack by Sunni
rebels on two U.S.-held buildings in Ramadi, Iraq. He had worked
for the station for one year.
On January 24,
the day before, Subramaniyam Sugitharajah, a part-time reporter
for the Sudar Oli, was killed by an
unidentified gunman on his way to work. Photographs taken by
Sugitharajah had shown that five students in Tamil, Sri Lanka,
had been killed by gunshot wounds January 2, despite claims by
the military that the men were blown up by their own grenade in
an attempted attack on the army.
And on January
6, Prahlad Goala of the Asomiya Khabar was
murdered near his home in Golaghat, Assam state, India. He had
written articles linking local forestry service officials to
timber smuggling.
So far this year, seven
journalists are confirmed, and two others suspected, dead. At
what number this tragic toll stops in 2006 is anyone's guess and,
at least for now, 2005 remains the most violent year in
journalism's history. The International Federation of Journalists
(IFJ) reported in January that 150 were killed last year,
including forty-eight in a December 6 plane crash in Tehran and
eighty-nine "killed in the line of duty, singled out for their
professional work."
The previous record was 129
deaths, set in 2004. The December 26, 2004 tsunami in Southeast
Asia claimed eighty-nine journalists, and marked the start of an
increasing trend in the field: foreign-location assignments are
killing journalists.
"Unfortunately,
journalists are now more part of the conflict," says Douglas
Struck, foreign correspondent for The Washington
Post. "It used to be that journalists felt with some
degree of accuracy that we were not in the line of fire, that we
had a special status as neutral observers that usually kept us
pretty safe. That's clearly not true any more, particularly in
Iraq, where journalists are targeted specifically by those on one
side."
The number of recorded deaths depends on
differing criteria. The Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ)
estimates forty-seven deaths in 2005, to 2004's fifty-seven. The
CPJ, whose numbers are the most widely cited, also says that a
total of eighty-four journalists have been killed in Iraq since
the conflict began in 2003. This figure excludes journalists who
have died in non-hostile situations, unlike the International
News Safety Institute (INSI), which cites 101 as the actual
figure of media deaths in the country. The INSI number more
closely coincides with the IFJ, reporting 146 casualties for the
year 2005 - thirty-three in Asia and eighty-seven in the Middle
East.
Though the exact figures differ, the
tally might as well be the same: too many. "It's a big challenge
to be a foreign correspondent," says Paul Loong, world editor for
Canadian Press. "You have to be adequately trained and take all
the necessary precautions while going about your
job."
But what can be
done?
"It depends on the area," says the
Post's Struck. "In the past, our major
precautions were our own wits. We had to evaluate every place we
went - how safe it was, the safest way to approach it, who you
can contact safely. For example, a local journalist or
translator... are they reliable, do they know the terrain and
territory?"
Struck says media personnel are now
transported in armoured cars between destinations. Armed guards
often accompany them as well, either in the vehicle with them or
in a trailing car to protect journalists from being kidnapped for
ransom or used as bargaining chips. "We live outside the Green
Zone in a compound heavily guarded by men with automatic rifles,"
he says. Travel is restricted in Iraq, more so than in
Afghanistan and other places. But that's changing, because now
"Afghanistan is looking increasingly dangerous," he says. INSI
reports that three journalists were killed in Afghanistan in
2004, compared to thirty-two in Iraq.
"The
problem is the dangers are so often around them and savage in
nature," says David Walmsley, assistant managing editor for
national and foreign news at The Toronto
Star. "We train our reporters in medical techniques
and try to minimize the potential for a random attack." Walmsley
says reporters are also equipped with hard hats, flak jackets,
and other safety and medical equipment when on assignment. "What
more can you do?"
INSI dedicates an entire
section of its site to safety tips for journalists, suggesting
they remain neutral and never carry firearms. It is also valuable
to understand the history of the area and to take hostile
environment courses before going into a conflict
zone.
"The people that go to troubled areas of
the world tend to be more experienced," says Loong. "There is
never total security, so it's a matter of being vigilant and
knowing the environment that can make the person respond more
promptly to threats."
The most valuable safety
precaution is almost universally adopted by news agencies:
foreign correspondents volunteer for potentially lethal
assignments. "A lot of journalists weigh the dangers of accepting
an assignment," says Struck, "and legitimately decide the danger
is not worth the story. Quite frankly, no story is worth being
killed for."
"Anytime we go to conflict zones,"
adds Walmsley, "we do it with a great degree of
caution."
Safety organizations respond to the
increase in deaths of journalists in any way possible. The CPJ
says it protects journalists by publicly revealing abuses against
the press, and by acting on behalf of imprisoned and threatened
journalists in order to warn others where attacks are occurring.
When news correspondents do get into trouble, it can intervene by
notifying news organizations, government officials and human
rights groups. Journalists in dire situations can also appeal to
the CPJ Journalist Assistance Program, which is "intended to aid
journalists who have been physically assaulted and need medical
attention; those who need to go into hiding or exile to escape
threats; and those in prison who have specific, material
needs."
Few Canadian news organizations have
their own foreign news departments, and as such aren't quite as
concerned with the alarming trend. Organizations that do, such as
CBC, haven't yet lost staff to hostile
environments.
However, the increase in violence
toward journalists cannot be ignored. Precautions are being
taken, but as the last two years have shown, being careful only
goes so far. "The challenges are ones we'll continually face,"
says Walmsley. "They're not going to go
away."
The seven recent deaths not only prove
Walmsley's point, they also paint a grim forecast. "Hopefully, we
don't pay the same price this year," he says, "but we
may."